U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Releases Annual List of Candidates for Endangered Species Act

Send by email Printer-friendly version Share this

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) today released its Candidate Notice of Review, a yearly appraisal of the current status of plants and animals considered candidates for protection under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Three species have been removed from candidate status, three have been added, and seven have a change in priority from the last review conducted in November of 2010. There are now 244 species recognized by the Service as candidates for ESA protection.

The candidate list offers the Service and our partners a unique opportunity to address the threats to these species through voluntary conservation efforts on public and private lands,” said Service Director Dan Ashe. “We will continue developing conservation strategies and programs that guide these conservation efforts and provide predictability to landowners undertaking actions to conserve non-listed species.”

Candidate species are plants and animals for which the Service has enough information on their status and the threats they face to propose them as threatened or endangered, but developing a proposed listing rule is precluded by higher priority listing actions. Candidate species do not receive protection under the ESA, although the Service works to conserve them. The annual review and identification of candidate species provides landowners and resource managers notice of species in need of conservation, allowing them to address threats and work to preclude the need to list the species. The Service is currently working with landowners and partners to implement voluntary conservation agreements covering 5 million acres of habitat for more than 130 candidate species.

Today’s notice identifies three new candidate species: bracted twistflower (TX), Poweshiek skipperling (upper Midwest), and magnificent ramshorn (NC). All candidates are assigned a listing priority number based on the magnitude and imminence of the threats they face. When adding species to the list of threatened or endangered species, the Service addresses species with the highest listing priority first. The seven changes in priority announced in today’s notice are based on new information in the updated assessments of continuing candidates. These changes include two species that increased in priority and five that lowered in priority.

The three species removed from the candidate list include Wekiu bug, Gila springsnail, and the New Mexico springsnail. Based on the identification of additional sites, combined with updated information on threats, the two springsnails no longer need the protection of the ESA. The removal of the wekiu bug is based on the successful management of the summit of Mauna Kea on the island of Hawaii. Survey work resulted in more than doubling the number of sites where this species is found. The protection and monitoring of the wekiu bug provided through the management plans for Mauna Kea has precluded the need to list this species.

The Service is soliciting additional information on these candidate species, as well as information on other species that may warrant protection under the Endangered Species Act. This information will be valuable in preparing listing documents and future revisions or supplements to the candidate notice of review.

The Service is working to make implementation of the ESA less complex, less contentious, and more effective. To further efforts for improving ESA implementation, the Service filed a multi-year listing work plan in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on May 10, 2011, developed through a settlement agreement with WildEarth Guardians and a separate, complementary settlement agreement with the Center for Biological Diversity on July 12, 2011. These historic agreements were approved by Judge Emmet Sullivan in Washington, D.C. on September 9, 2011, and will allow the Service to more effectively focus its efforts on providing the benefits of the ESA to those imperiled species most in need of protection. This work plan will enable the agency to systematically, over a period of six years, review and address the needs of candidate species to determine if they require ESA protection. A list of these species is available at http://www.fws.gov/endangered/improving_ESA/listing_workplan.html.

The Service has also multiple tools for protecting candidate species and their habitats, including a grants program that funds conservation projects by private landowners, states and territories. In addition, the Service can enter into Candidate Conservation Agreements (CCAs), formal agreements between the Service and one or more public or private parties to address the conservation needs of proposed or candidate species, or species likely to become candidates, before they actually become listed as endangered or threatened. CCA participants voluntarily commit to implementing specific actions removing or reducing the threats to these species, thereby contributing to stabilizing or restoring the species. Through 110 CCAs, habitat for more than 100 species is managed on federal, state, local agency, tribal and private lands; many CAAs have multiple cooperators focusing conservation actions in an area supporting a single or multiple species. Another similar tool is the Candidate Conservation Agreement with Assurances (CCAAs).

While these voluntary agreements are only between the Service and non-Federal landowners, they have the same goals as CCAs in addressing threats to candidate species, but with additional incentives for conservation actions on non-Federal lands. More than 60 landowners in 15 states have enrolled over 1 million acres of habitat for 40 species.

The complete notice and list of proposed and candidate species appears in the Federal Register and can be found online at http://www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/cnor.html.

Comments

Retired2hunt's picture

  I wouldn't know a bracted

 

I wouldn't know a bracted twistflower or a Poweshiek skipperling if they bit me on the backend!

Seriously one is a purple flower and the other a butterfly.

I don't know much about the Endangered Species Act to comment on those responsible for using it and their viability to properly determine when a species needs to be delisted or listed.  I took a look at the full list and there are many plant and insects versus mammals. 

 

numbnutz's picture

The current form of the ESA

The current form of the ESA is a joke. The system needs to be overhauled in a major way. I'm glad there is something in place to help protect animal and it looks like insect from becoming extincted but it really needs to be overhauled. The wolfs and California seals are good example on why this system is broken. It was meant to protect animal from be wiped out. The wolf population in North America is stable enough to where they should have been delisted years ago and the seals are in the same boat with well over 100,000 seals they are in no way in danger of becoming extinct. It's the anti's and animal extremist that bog down the system and make it hard to remove these animals wen they have no bussiness being on the list.