BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums
 [Register]  [Search]  [Hunting Forum Rules]  [FAQ]
 [Log in to check your private messages]  [Memberlist]
 [Log in]
BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forum Index -> Anything Goes... -> Are crossbows archery equipment? (October 2004 Poll) Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
moderator
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Jan 2002
Posts: 7655

PostPosted: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:33 am    Post subject: Are crossbows archery equipment? (October 2004 Poll) Reply with quote


October 2004 Poll:

Are crossbows archery equipment?

To vote in this poll, please visit our home page. The poll is on the right hand side.

The argument over crossbow use during archery only season is not new. Crossbow hunting itself is not new and many (but not all) regions have allowed crossbow hunting in general firearms seasons for some time.

Regional and national archery organizations have lobbied game departments to prevent crossbow use during archery only seasons on the grounds that crossbows "are not archery equipment". However in recent years, crossbow hunting is seeing more adoption by game management departments in the archery only seasons. Press releases by various wildlife managers declare crossbows to be close enough to compound bows in order to be considered archery equipment.

Where do you stand on this issue? As a recurve or compound archer, do you consider the "crossbow invasion" to be detrimental to your recreation? If you are a non-archer, would crossbow adoption during traditional recurve/compound only seasons motivate you to start hunting the archery only season in your area?


Last edited by moderator on Mon Nov 08, 2004 3:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
JTapia
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 21 Aug 2003
Posts: 1346
Location: Florida,USA

PostPosted: Wed Oct 13, 2004 2:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


My knowledge of Crossbows amounts to this, it shoots short lil arrows, it's a real pain to "cock", and they seem to ruff-up the feathers on almost as many people as the great .270 cal. for Elk debate.

My Bow hunts are between the Deer and myself and nobody else. It makes no difference in my Bow hunt if the guy down the road is using a cross bow or even a firearm.

I find it hard to believe that THAT many more people will be in the woods just because they have allowed crossbows to be used. More than likely the same number of hunters will be in your area reguardless of whether or not crossbows are allowed.

Personally I hunt with a compound and there are still debates about compounds vs recurves, more rightly so than if crossbows are "Archery" or not. I have no desire to hunt with a crossbow as my hunts are for my enjoyment and challange and, believe me, my compound gives me a-plenty of a challange. However I see no problem with someone else using one if they so desire.

As to the Question.......I dont know cause I have never hunted or practiced with one so I dont know if it would give me an unfair(?) advantage over a compound or a recurve.

My vote...mabe
Back to top
donmillion
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 27 Feb 2003
Posts: 394
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


I agree completely, JTapia. I hunt with a muzzleloader. This crossbow vs. other debate is much like the traditional vs. inline debate among muzzleloaders. Personally, I don't care. I use a traditional muzzleloader because that's the hunting experience that I want. I could not care less if the guy in the next canyon over is using an inline, though a lot of muzzleloader hunters seem to get awfully worked up about that.
Back to top
saskie
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 23 Dec 2002
Posts: 1110
Location: West Carleton, Ottawa, Canada

PostPosted: Mon Oct 18, 2004 6:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


I voted no. It's almost unanimously agreed that the learning curve to become proficient with a crossbow is far less than that with "conventional" bows, even with all the bells and whistles.

I think that Sask (no bias intended - lol) handles this appropriately by allowing crossbows in the muzzleloader season (after bow, but before rifle) but not archery.
Back to top
bitmasher
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 27 Feb 2002
Posts: 2760
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


No offense Saskie, but I don't think that "difficulty" is an adequate test for determining whether something is or is not in an equipment group. I agree that learning to use a compound (and certainly a recurve) are harder than learning to use a crossbow, but I don't see how that applies to whether it is or is not a piece of archery equipment.

For instance, a scope makes it much easier (less difficult) to consistently hit a pie plate at 200 yards over iron sights. However this doesn't mean that a rifle w/ a scope is not a firearm.

When I compare crossbows and compound bows, to me it seems they are sufficiently similar to be considered archery equipment. Both roughly have a max effective range of around 40 yards, both use double limbs, both shoot arrows, both require the hunter to be an effective stalker. Both are a one shot situation, true you might get a second shot off with a crossbow, but you might also get a second shot off with a bow.
Back to top
trouthunter
Buck Master
Buck Master


Joined: 03 Jun 2004
Posts: 52
Location: Pennsylvania

PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Everybody knows my view on this issue
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   All times are GMT - 6 Hours

 

Hunting News & Info | Articles | Advertise with BGH! | Privacy Statement | BGH Hunting HOME
Featured Guides & Outfitters | Hunting Stories and Photos | Recipes | Hunting Directory | Sitemap | Forum Archives
Contact us at info@biggamehunt.net

© 2000-2009 RiderWeb, Inc.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group