| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
moderator
Moderator
Joined: 27 Jan 2002
Posts: 7655
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 10:42 am Post subject: Montana's Forest Jobs and Recreation Act |
 |
|
Full Story:
Montana's Forest Jobs and Recreation Act
Please use this area to post comments or questions about this news item. |
|
| Back to top |
tim
Sportsman
Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 382
Location: north idaho
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I understand trying to balance things. But we don't need anymore wilderness.
Wilderness is not the great save all everyone thinks it is. We already have more than enough.
tim |
|
| Back to top |
elkkill06
Sportsman
Joined: 02 Feb 2009
Posts: 274
Location: Fruita Colorado
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I totally agree with you tim, I am tired of everyone wanting more wilderness areas. I have pictures of when I was 2 and 3 years old on the Uncompahgre in Colorado in high traffic areas and it is still the same. The only difference is the trees and bushes are a lot bigger. I'm tired of them taking away our public lands.  |
|
| Back to top |
exbiologist
Sportsman
Joined: 19 Sep 2008
Posts: 701
Location: Colorado
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't get how can designate an area as wilderness, yet still leave access open to logging and claim not to infringe on recreation. If it is currently roadless, I see how you can claim you aren't restricting access for recreation, but I don't see how they can claim to still leave it open for logging.
That article lacked some important details. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
