BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums
 [Register]  [Search]  [Hunting Forum Rules]  [FAQ]
 [Log in to check your private messages]  [Memberlist]
 [Log in]
BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forum Index -> Firearm - Long Guns -> CDC Releases Lead Bullet Study Results Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
moderator
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 27 Jan 2002
Posts: 7655

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:07 pm    Post subject: CDC Releases Lead Bullet Study Results Reply with quote


Full Story:

CDC Releases Lead Bullet Study Results

Please use this area to post comments or questions about this news item.
Back to top
Hammer1
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 1701

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 5:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Thank God I have no intentions of becoming pregnant
Back to top
ChesterGolf
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 17 Aug 2002
Posts: 1825
Location: Nova Scotia

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


I'd be more concerned with the effects of reloading/handling lead bullets and using lead bullets at indoor ranges.

I remember as a kid I used to put lead pellets in my mouth to hold them so I could reload my single shot pellet gun faster. It didn't bother me... I can see just fine out of my three eyes. Evil!
Back to top
cowgal
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 10 Mar 2002
Posts: 1562
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 6:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Hammer1 wrote:
Thank God I have no intentions of becoming pregnant


Now that would be a sight to behold!!!

Growing up I remember eating all kinds of game (rabbits, pheasant, waterfowl etc.) that were shot with lead shot and from time to time, I'm sure I ingested some.

I cannot imagine a bullet leaving enough lead in the meat to really make that big of a difference. I guess if you ate a whole fragment it could be a problem, but I don't ever recall in all my years of eating big game every running into a bullet fragment. Plus we have always trimmed away any bullet damaged meat and don't eat it.
Back to top
Don Fischer
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2503
Location: Antelope, Ore

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 12:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


I don't like studies like that. They find anything at all and the sky is falling. Their job is to find things bad for you.
_________________
Greg Campbell - Apr 15, 2009 - See ya later my friend!

Don't let your stupity over shadow your ignorance!
Back to top
ADKBEAR
Moderator/Sportsman
Moderator/Sportsman


Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Posts: 802
Location: Central NY

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 6:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Don Fischer wrote:
I don't like studies like that. They find anything at all and the sky is falling. Their job is to find things bad for you.


Exactly!
If they don't get the results they need they wont get any funding next year. So find that satistical equation that says young childeren and pregnant (old codgers neener! ) will die a horrible death and funding is had.

Very sad that this was a volitary program and now they will be X-Raying the meat. How much is tha going to cost?
Back to top
Hammer1
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 03 Dec 2005
Posts: 1701

PostPosted: Sat Nov 08, 2008 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Anyone know how much lead was in the paint on the right front fender of a 1976 Ford F250. You see, Buddy & I smoked a moose thirty years ago, salvaged all the meat and people constantly say to me " You haven't been right in decades"
Could that be the reason Think Think Think
Back to top
civetcat
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 29 Jul 2008
Posts: 723

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Good science should set out to disprove itself anyway.

Say for instance you find elevated lead levels in people eating game. Next you should look for other causes, or increase your sample size, work on every variable to prove yourself wrong. The harder it is to prove yourself wrong, the higher the probability of being correct.

I wish I know where I found it but I heard recently of donated meat given to shelters and food banks having to be destroyed. It tested very high for lead. Turns out all the meat was made into burger and the lead might well have been chopped up with the meat into tiny pieces.

My wife butchers all of our meat and we seldom grind any, we mostly make sausage from pork and the small amounts we do grind are done by hand, no chunks of lead. Having small children it is something I try to be aware of. Thank you for posting Moderator.
Back to top
remington
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 349
Location: Misouri

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


.........and smoking causes cancer.
Back to top
Tatertot45
Buck Master
Buck Master


Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Posts: 69
Location: Minnesota

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 8:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


The lead tainted game was found in minnesota. I have a degree in biology and i find this study very tough to support. i find it extremely hard to believe that a bullet can leave that much lead behind, and then a human injest it. Also, in the article i read in the MN paper said that the range of lead concentrations was at 9.2 or so, at it's highest, in this study. the next sentence was that anything over 12 was considered a situation where intervention was needed. So if the highest levels of this study were below "intervention" levels, why are we intervening? Either don't intervene or lower the standard. Also, i think the lead is coming from somewhere else, like the water or food supply. I think that all those years of leaded gasoline/ommisions have worked its ways into the wells of the local farmers, and the farmers are using that tainted water to irrigate their crops. The deer are then eating the crops, becuase that is what they do, and we are then eating the venison that is saturated with lead. The deers lifespan is too short to manifest symptoms of lead poisoning, so we miss it there.

just my 2 pennies...
Back to top
BunnySlayer
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 06 Sep 2008
Posts: 910
Location: California

PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


The CDC has long had an anti gun bias anyway. I for one have been ingesting meat killed by lead bullets for years and have never been affect..........adobobuiadoibgwefruobiafugouihadgfioubh14198fjkaf.......ed whatsoever. Never experienced s single pro....bubwduigv19745y179761945..blem. Nope. Not me. A Ok. Yup. Eat up folks. No worries.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   All times are GMT - 6 Hours

 

Hunting News & Info | Articles | Advertise with BGH! | Privacy Statement | BGH Hunting HOME
Featured Guides & Outfitters | Hunting Stories and Photos | Recipes | Hunting Directory | Sitemap | Forum Archives
Contact us at info@biggamehunt.net

© 2000-2009 RiderWeb, Inc.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group