BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums
 [Register]  [Search]  [Hunting Forum Rules]  [FAQ]
 [Log in to check your private messages]  [Memberlist]
 [Log in]
BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forum Index -> Firearm - Long Guns -> Greatest cartridge ever. Reply to topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Don Fischer
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2503
Location: Antelope, Ore

PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:10 pm    Post subject: Greatest cartridge ever. Reply with quote


What do you think? Gonna hear a lot for the 30-06 I bet but, Take a look at the 308. It will do about everything the 30-06 will do. And got to be one of the two because not only versitile but cartridge's they've spawned.

30-06
25-06, 270, 280, 35 Whelan

308
243, 260, 6.8,7mm-08, What's the new 338 called?, 358

That is some awful impressive cartridges! And in my opinion, either one will handle anything in N. Amer.

Maybe a case could be made for the 8x57 too. there's a bunch of good off spring there too.

8x57
5.6x57, 6mm, 257 Roberts,6.5x57, 7x57

You have another idea? Throw it out there. I guess a case could be made for the 458Win, lot of good ones off of it.

_________________
Greg Campbell - Apr 15, 2009 - See ya later my friend!

Don't let your stupity over shadow your ignorance!
Back to top
Critter
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 184
Location: Western Colorado

PostPosted: Tue Sep 01, 2009 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


You must be planning on a long fishing trip with the size of the can of worms that you just opened.

I personally believe that it is quite simple. It is the 30-06. No other round has been made that fits so many rifles and is loaded in all the actions, from single shot all the way to a full automatic. You can finds rounds from a 110 grain all the way up to 220 grains and it shoots all of them equally well. The 308 is there also but the 06 was the first and oldest so I'll have to go with it.
Back to top
Old Professor
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 13 Jan 2007
Posts: 232
Location: Upper Peninsula of Michigan

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Although I have never owned a 30-06 and prefer the 308, I have to agree with Critter. Sheer numbers and varity of firearms chambered for the 30-06 win this debate. That said, I think the 308 and its offspring offer greater versatility but that was not the origional question.
Back to top
Don Fischer
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2503
Location: Antelope, Ore

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Hey Critter, what is life without worms? Laugh

I have a strong prefgerence myself for the 308. Just a thought, you can build a 308 on a light short action, can't do that with an 06! Sace yourself 3 oz of weight and not quite 1" bolt travel for fast follow up shots.

_________________
Greg Campbell - Apr 15, 2009 - See ya later my friend!

Don't let your stupity over shadow your ignorance!
Back to top
ADKBEAR
Moderator/Sportsman
Moderator/Sportsman


Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Posts: 802
Location: Central NY

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Don
First, the "new" one is the 338 Federal.
Now I see you are taking a geonlogical (sp?) angle here. That being the case you would have to defer to the parent case to the 308. That being the 300 Savage that Mr. Newten developed in the early 1900's.
My first choice though would have to be the versital .22, it has killed everything from mice and snakes right up to bears (I'm sure not the first choice!). It was the first metalic cartridge and anybody out there who has a gun has a 22. Ruger has stared that they have sold enough 10-22's to put 3 in every houshold in America.
What is the first firearm that anybody shoots?
Back to top
WesternHunter
Bull Whacker
Bull Whacker


Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 1075
Location: Colorado

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


I agree. At least in this country the .30-06 has proven to be the most used and versatile cartridge for biggame hunting in a centerfire bolt action rifle. It was introduced for military service in 1906 but really wasn't widely available on the commercial market nor widely used by hunters until the years after the first world war. Even in those early days most of the '06 cartridges used by hunters were military surplus FMJ rounds.

But is it the "best" or just the most widely used/versatile in the last 90 years? There are a few other very versatile biggame cartridges out there. I always say that the best cartridge is the one that you shoot best and provides result for you.
Back to top
tim
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 11 Jun 2004
Posts: 382
Location: north idaho

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 12:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


270 wsm becasue it is working for me.


IMG_2714res.JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  131.84 KB
 Viewed:  41 Time(s)

IMG_2714res.JPG


Back to top
Tndeerhunter
Buck Master
Buck Master


Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 63
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


It's very difficult to make a good case against the 30/06, both as an individual cartridge and the family of spawned cartridges. The .308 has never had a factory answer to the 25/06, and many think the little cousin of the 30/06 is significantly better than the .243(include me). The 30/06 and .308, as individual cartridges, are so very similar as to be pretty much indistiguishable until we talk bullet weights of 180gr or above.

The 30/06 is a formidable cartridge when you add the power and S.D. of 200 and 220gr loads, and on the top end, the .35 Whelen does hold a significant edge in power over the fine .358, and is also a much better round than most give it credit for, capable of harvesting any game animal in N.A. with 250gr and even larger bullets, and also maintaining pretty good velocity with them. And don't leave out the fine, but also underappreciated .338/06.

Yup, it's pretty doggone tough to look past the 30/06 as an alltime great and even, perhaps the best of them all. Thumbs up
Back to top
Don Fischer
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2503
Location: Antelope, Ore

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Tndeerhunter wrote:
It's very difficult to make a good case against the 30/06, both as an individual cartridge and the family of spawned cartridges. The .308 has never had a factory answer to the 25/06, and many think the little cousin of the 30/06 is significantly better than the .243(include me). The 30/06 and .308, as individual cartridges, are so very similar as to be pretty much indistiguishable until we talk bullet weights of 180gr or above.

The 30/06 is a formidable cartridge when you add the power and S.D. of 200 and 220gr loads, and on the top end, the .35 Whelen does hold a significant edge in power over the fine .358, and is also a much better round than most give it credit for, capable of harvesting any game animal in N.A. with 250gr and even larger bullets, and also maintaining pretty good velocity with them. And don't leave out the fine, but also underappreciated .338/06.

Yup, it's pretty doggone tough to look past the 30/06 as an alltime great and even, perhaps the best of them all. Thumbs up


That's pretty well thought out; your fired!

_________________
Greg Campbell - Apr 15, 2009 - See ya later my friend!

Don't let your stupity over shadow your ignorance!
Back to top
Highflyer
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 06 Jan 2007
Posts: 200
Location: Somewhere Up There

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Tradition doesn't make something right, it just makes it old. The 308 maintains the same velocity as the 30.06 up to 165 / 168 grain bullet weight with a lot less recoil. On top of that any of the 308 family are a lot less fussy (generally speaking) than the 30.06. If you take the history and emotion out of the equation the 308 is a more efficient and accurate cartridge for any hooved critter in the states. I've shot a good number of beasts with the '06 and finally woke up to the value of the 308 this last year.

I'll throw in my vote for the 308 for general hunting and the 375 H and H for big nasties. The WSMs are a close runner up.

_________________
Any fool can be a critic.
Back to top
remington
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 30 Nov 2005
Posts: 349
Location: Misouri

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote


Being devels advocate with todays bullets it's to close to call as the gap closes pretty damend quick. Yes
Back to top
Tndeerhunter
Buck Master
Buck Master


Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 63
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Well, I've used a bunch of calibers to collect venison, all worked well (obviously). But, one thing I learned is that there's no free ride. If you want to shoot a .308 cal 165 gr bullet 2700 fps from an 8lb rifle, it doesn't matter if it's a .308, 30/06 or .300WM, it will recoil the same. The idea that one is better, recoil-wise, when looking at like performance simply isn't correct, IMO.

A .308 can feel lower in recoil, if fired at lower velocity, from a similar gun, from a heavier gun, or perhaps from a better designed stock. But in like rifles, with the same velocity, recoil will be virtually the same. Certainly nothing wrong with the fine .308 or it's extended family of cartridges. I own and shoot most all of them myself and my two largest whitetails were taken with a .308. But, it's simply foolish, IMO, to say flatly that it shoots as fast and recoils less Shame on You!

I own, several .308s and also several 30/06s and depending on rifle and load, one will recoil more than the other, but it can also be the .308 recoiling more than the '06. A perfect example is my Ruger 77 RSI shooting 180s, as it's recoil is definitely noticeable...lol

More worms for the can! Brick Wall
Back to top
Don Fischer
Moderator/Bull Whacker
Moderator/Bull Whacker


Joined: 24 Mar 2005
Posts: 2503
Location: Antelope, Ore

PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


That is absolutely true. Tell me why do people get more cartridge than they need then make it useable by either loading it down, or getting reduced recoil loads, rather than getting the cartridge they can handle in the first place?
_________________
Greg Campbell - Apr 15, 2009 - See ya later my friend!

Don't let your stupity over shadow your ignorance!
Back to top
Critter
Sportsman
Sportsman


Joined: 26 Mar 2009
Posts: 184
Location: Western Colorado

PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Don Fischer wrote:
That is absolutely true. Tell me why do people get more cartridge than they need then make it useable by either loading it down, or getting reduced recoil loads, rather than getting the cartridge they can handle in the first place?


I believe that it is the mocho factor and or buying the newest fastest magnum on the market and then deciding that they don't like the recoil. A friend of mine picked up a beautiful Weatherby Mark V in 340 Weatherby for $200.00 just because the owner didn't like the recoil. He had heard all about it and use it on one hunt and then sold it. I have also seen a couple of the new Whinchester Short magnums go the same way. The guys that bought them thought that they were the answer to everything but didn't do their home work and found out that their original 300 magnum was just as good.

I also have never bought into the idea of a shorter case is quicker than the long case such as the 308 vrs the 30-06. In a bolt or pump action rifle there isn't that much difference when you cycle the bolt to chamber a new round. Even in a semi-automatic the time difference is not noticeable. Now in a full automatic then after a 1000 rounds of steady fire one may have the advantage but not by much.
Back to top
Tndeerhunter
Buck Master
Buck Master


Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 63
Location: Tennessee

PostPosted: Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


Don Fischer wrote:
That is absolutely true. Tell me why do people get more cartridge than they need then make it useable by either loading it down, or getting reduced recoil loads, rather than getting the cartridge they can handle in the first place?


Well, I think sometimes they are looking at the "worst case scenario" perhaps. Or, maybe more possibly, they are wanting to purchase a rifle that can be multi-use, or the cliche, "all-around rifle". Some figure that if they buy a .300 UM, that they can then make (or in the case of the UM, buy) various power levls of ammunition, so as to be properly "gunned" for antelope through grizzly bear.

There might be some merit to that simple idea, but remember, you will be sitting in a tree stand, hoping to shoot a whitetail, perhaps 75 yards distant, with "power level one" ammo, making the rifle a standard '06. But remember you're still handling a 26" barreled super magnum rifle. Simply not my cup of tea. I also think many hunters (I'll admit, I'm not immune) also get mesmerized at the velocities and trajectories some magnums boast.

All of which matters not, when Mr. Whitetail pops out at 75 yds. If you have a .300 Savage, or a .300 mag, with proper bullet placement and performance, you soon have Mr. Dead Whitetail. Some might argue that in that particular circumstance, the .300 Sav is even the better choice.

As far a extra performance for hunting larger game, I've always belonged to the large game=larger bullet needed camp. If you want to shoot an elk, weighing twice or three times as much as a deer, why not move up in caliber and bullet weight too instead of simply using faster deer-sized bullets? Just always made sense to me. Perhaps I've read too much Elmer though....lol. Laugh
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic   All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

 

Hunting News & Info | Articles | Advertise with BGH! | Privacy Statement | BGH Hunting HOME
Featured Guides & Outfitters | Hunting Stories and Photos | Recipes | Hunting Directory | Sitemap | Forum Archives
Contact us at info@biggamehunt.net

© 2000-2009 RiderWeb, Inc.


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group