| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Night Raider
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 124
Location: Kitchener-Waterloo, ON
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 3:14 pm Post subject: Shot size suggestions |
|
|
I was hoping I could get some others opinions on shot sizes for duck and goose. For ducks it will be jump shooting, pass shooting and some over decoys on a small stream. As for geese it will only be pass shooting or jump shooting and of course it will be steel. Also any comments on chokes would be appreciated.
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
WesternHunter
Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 680
Location: Western USA
|
| Posted: Tue Sep 05, 2006 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ducks - 12 guage, use high velocity steel 3" shells shot sizes of No3, No2 and No1. Pass shooting use a modified or full choke with No2's or smaller and a modified choke only with No1's or larger steel. Over decoys on a small steam use steel No2's with an improved cylinder choke.
Geese - 12 guage, use high velocity steel 3" or 3 1/2" shells with T shot size or BB shot. Use a modified choke with this larger sized steel shot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
WesternHunter
Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 680
Location: Western USA
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh, one more thing. Your choke seletion should also take into consideration the distance you will shoot birds. Example - over decoys and close in, a full choke is too dense and will be too destructive. Out to 50 or 60 yards of pass shooting, an improved cylinder is too open and your shot pattern will be too scattered, you will hit the bird with some pellets, but not with enough energy for a clean kill.
Generally speaking, steel shot size No1 or larger out of a modified choke tube will pattern like lead shot fired out of a full choke tube. So avoid a full choke with stuff like No1, BB, or T or larger sized shot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Serious Hunter
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Idaho
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Back in the `lead' days I killed a huge number of Mallards with 1 oz #4 20 ga, full choke. Over a close decoy spread one could argue improved, or mod, but we were always happy with full. The situation is this: the first shot may be point blank, but successive shots are farther away. I would only use improved if I ONLY had point blank shots.
Even when decoy hunting beaver ponds - point blank shooting - we used mod or full.
I have produced duck mush with a modified choke.
Last year I shot various steels and ended up using the Bismuth stuff. I don't care much about the hot muzzle velocities steel because a higher muzzle velocity will have higher drag and slow down faster, then all you have is a `light' pellet that won't penetrate. I want stuff that is dense - acting more like lead. The Bismuth shot was like `magic' after shooting various steel loads.
Mallards: Last year I used # 6, 1-3/8 oz, with mod choke. I started off this year with the same - and as I have been cleaning birds it has struck me how small the pellets are and that they are not going in all that deep. So, I have ordered some #5. I may go full cirlce with #4 - we'll see. I like a lot of pellets because I want to at least break a wing.
Smaller Ducks (teal, widgeon, etc.): I probably would not use a shot size larger than #5 or #6 ... but since I'll be shooting almost entirely Mallards - I may go to #4.
Geese: BB or BBB. Yum. Bismuth.
In my left vest pocket I carry BB or BBB, and in my right I carry the duck loads. Never know when you might have to switch on short order :yes: .
So far this year - jump shooting - which can produce birds at any range. I love modified. There are few things more wonderful than watching two birds fold in one shot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Serious Hunter
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Idaho
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 30, 2006 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, I am hitting mallards hard out to 40 or so yards with the Bismuth no-tox #5 and Bismuth no-tox #6 and the fellets are passing all the way thru or nearly all the way thru. The last 10 or so trigger pull have put 9 or mallards in the bag. Since both #5 and #6 are passing thru, and the pellet doesn't do much good once it has done so - I think I'll switch back to #6 ... more pellets, and greater chance of breaking a wing. I'm finding that with #5 I am hitting some birds - but if a wing isn't broken - they fly some distance before crash landing.
Bismuth is expensive stuff - I don't waste it on tweety birds.
I'm using modified choke. |
|
| Back to top |
|
SNOWMAN0813
Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 81
Location: ALABAMA
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Personally, the best all around combo for ducks that I have found is 3" #3's through a modified choke. In the few times I was hunting small water( beaver pond, small creek) I would change to improved cylinder and # 5 shot. The sole reason for this was to prevent total destruction of the meat. If I had them Iwould even change to a 2 3/4 in shell. A magnum load thruogh a modified choke at 15 yards is very destructive. Nothing ruins my day more than wasting game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
WesternHunter
Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 680
Location: Western USA
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SNOWMAN0813 has given some very sound advise. Good thinking. :thumbsup1: |
|
| Back to top |
|
SNOWMAN0813
Joined: 06 Dec 2005
Posts: 81
Location: ALABAMA
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Believe me, I've made that mistake before. You live and learn and try to help others avoid your mistakes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Serious Hunter
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Idaho
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Good stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Serious Hunter
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Idaho
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Udate: the weather is cold and the cover is dimished (longer shots), and the ducks perhaps have thicker `hide'. The # 6 seem to be hitting them a little light. I think I'll shift to # 5 (Bismuth). |
|
| Back to top |
|
ChesterGolf
Joined: 17 Aug 2002
Posts: 1590
Location: Nova Scotia
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 7:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Good idea to switch to the #5 bismuth or even the #4's. That fat layer is getting real thick this time of year and most birds have encountered hunters by now so shots will be longer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Serious Hunter
Joined: 01 Jun 2004
Posts: 936
Location: Idaho
|
| Posted: Sun Dec 17, 2006 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, I shot # 5 this morning, with greater effectiveness (it seems). My eyes are not all that great (for tracking, it seems ... too much computer time). And, yeah, I may even put # 4 on the menu.
While I was cleaning the bird I got yesterday I recovered some of the # 6 ... whoa they seemed small. I cut open a round of # 6 lead upland shells, to compare. Yeah, # 6 is too small for Mallards, except perhaps early in the season when they hardly have a layer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
trappermike
Joined: 26 Jun 2007
Posts: 80
Location: Western ans Northern Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow,I'm so lost now in the world of steel and bismuth shot. Is lead shot banned in all USA or just some states?
I used to to use (lead) #4 for ducks and #4 buckshot for geese! No peppering them and leaving them to die some where,you hit and kill,or miss.
But the the rules have changed now.
I hope someone can enlighten me on steel loads equal to my goose loads...
I like heavy shot,obviously... |
|
| Back to top |
|
WesternHunter
Joined: 05 May 2006
Posts: 680
Location: Western USA
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 01, 2007 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are you kidding??? #4 Buckshot for geese??? WTF??? I must say that buckshot no matter what size is way too big and way too over destructive for any size bird, including the largest geese. Not to mension that #4 buckshot will travel much farther than the most powerfull steel shot. Not real safe to be shooting buckshot into the air. Lead has been illeagal for waterfowl nationally in the USA since 1991, and some states and areas are considering only steel shot for upland birds too. No way man, go with a smaller steel shot size for geese.
For geese in steelshot I stick with BB in modified choke, but have use T shot too before, but have never gone any larger than T shot though. Here in Colorado you can't use anything larger than T shot for waterfowl or any other birds. For ducks I use #2 high velocity steel almost exclusively, and try to shoot all my birds beyond 20 yrds out to no farther than 45 yrds, 50 yrds or so. I' always killed em out of the sky just fine. Keep in mind that waterfowl are in range when they are inside of 50 yards, and definitley no farther than 60 yrds.
Another idea that seems to be lost on a lot of hunters today (especially new hunters) is the idea that when they see game they think that they have to shoot it. There are certain things you must consider before taking the shot, be it big game or small game. Is it too close? Will I damage too much meat? Can I make this shot? Is it too far? What's beyond my target? Is it a safe shot to all but the game? Can I retrieve my game once it's down? All things that must be considered before firing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |