BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums
Hunting Forum Archives
 

View Full Version : Is bait hunting fair chase?
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
       BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums -> Politics
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
moderator



Joined: 27 Jan 2002
Posts: 6422

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 6:27 pm    Post subject:  

November 2002 BGH Poll:
Is bait hunting fair chase?

Several states ban the use of bait when hunting big game particularly in regards to bear hunting, the usual reason being that bait hunting is not fair chase.

Recently Wisconsin also joined the no baiting states as well and have had problems with hunters ignoring the ban.

Wisconsin Baiting Ban Ignored

Is baiting an efficient way to bag game or is it breaking the rules of fair chase?

[ This Message was edited by: moderator on 2002-11-04 17:27 ]
Back to top  
expatriate



Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1148
Location: Alaska

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 6:49 pm    Post subject:  

Incendiary issue, to be sure...I'm sure there'll be a lot of posts on this one.

The one time in my life I agreed with an animal rights activist centered on this issue. I was working in Glacier Park, MT, and had a friend that was somewhat left of center (i.e. Defenders of Wildlife member). There was a strip of land on the South edge of the park at the bottom of a valley between the park and the Bob Marshall Wilderness. Burlington Northern had tracks through there, and a year or two before a carload of corn had derailed, spilling corn everywhere. Most had been cleaned up, but there were still huge piles of fermenting corn left over.

The site was accessible by car, and only required about a 100 yd walk down the tracks. We went there one night and spotted 5 black bears within stone-throwing distance, half drunk on the corn. The subject of upcoming bear season arose, and I agreed to help my friend circulate a successful petition to shut down that year's bear hunting in that portion of that particular valley.

He thought it odd that a hunter would help him with this. Those of you who've read my other posts on the issue would no doubt have a tough time believing it, too. But Montana is a no-baiting state and it seemed pretty thin for a hunter to claim this wasn't using bait. As conservative as I am, I didn't want my anti-hunting friend to have a cause to champion in the media, nor did I want a fellow hunter to wind up on the wrong side of a fuzzy legal definition after the fact.

But that's the stalk hunter with a Montana perspective in me talking. I realize this is an intensely personal choice among hunters, and in large part can be a reflection of local culture and hunting conditions. In heavily hunted areas where I've lived, there's something to be said for stationary hunters watching bait piles versus hot tempers, accidents, and lost game associated with hundreds of stalk hunters running into each other.

[ This Message was edited by: expatriate on 2002-11-04 18:44 ]
Back to top  
bitmasher



Joined: 27 Feb 2002
Posts: 2595
Location: Colorado

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2002 11:24 pm    Post subject:  

Well this is definitely going to be an interesting topic, as I write this the votes are pretty much split 50-50.

I understand what you are saying Expatriate. There is little that will get an animal rights activist (or even the general public) more wound up than "canned hunting" or even something that may resemble canned hunting. (Although as a side note, is there anything more canned than a slaughter house? But yet the vast majority have no problem patronizing McDonalds. Irony? Probably.) The cliche "shooting fish in a barrel" seems to get everybody wound up.

But back to the main line. Is bait hunting fair chase? I look at putting out a bait pile as similar to hunting an active water hole within an arid climate. The bait pile and the water hole will both attract your quarry. Both make the hunt easier and both increase your chase of filling your tag.

So from this perspective, hunting a bait pile is no different than hunting a water hole. Therefore I'd have to say it is fair chase, although not as much of a "chase" as I would like. Personally I've never hunted with bait, not because I have something against, but because it wasn't how I was taught to hunt. I grew up with a bunch of "spot and stalk" types.

[ This Message was edited by: bitmasher on 2002-11-04 22:26 ]
Back to top  
12ga. mag.



Joined: 04 Nov 2002
Posts: 6
Location: upstate N.Y.

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 2:32 pm    Post subject:  

in all honestly, how can a person with a gun put out a pail of food to a hungry deer and then shoot it while it is eating, and then call themselves a hunter?.
my idea of hunting is just what it says, "HUNTING" Scout the land, get out before daylight and stay out til dark, They still have all the odds in their favor, but I have the weapon and i owe them a fair chance.
Grizzly and boar are a different subject, I've never hunted them but from what i've read, i want all the odds in my favor. hand grenades or what ever it takes

[ This Message was edited by: 12ga. mag. on 2002-11-05 13:40 ]
Back to top  
expatriate



Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1148
Location: Alaska

Posted: Tue Nov 05, 2002 3:36 pm    Post subject:  

12ga:
In some of the places I've lived, bait hunting for deer is like ice fishing. Of all the bait piles in the woods, I hope he comes to mine.

I personally tend to agree with you that bait hunting isn't hunting. But obviously the results of the survey, although not scientific, suggest my assumptions about the sport aren't as universal as I thought.

Everybody has their own ethical line in the sand that they won't cross. The problem is that hunters are a diverse group and there's no standardized "ethics" of the sport. When you get right down to it, this debate could include other topics, like:

Scopes/binoculars
Dogs
Cow calls, doe scent, bugles, etc
Antler rattling
Camouflage

All these things either give you an unnatural advantage or use the animal's behavior against itself -- same as baiting.

Bit points out the other gray area. Is it ethical to hunt over naturally-occurring water, salt licks, or food sources like apple orchards? If the apple orchard is alongside a road, is it ethical for me to pick up apples from the orchard and place them in a pile a quarter mile away where I can take a shot?

The difference is where you draw your ethical line. Different state laws reflect the range of ethical boundaries in our sport. For example, in Montana you can't hunt with bait, recorded game calls, radios, or cel phones. That's not the case in other states.

But as I said, I think baiting's over my personal line, and I didn't hunt when I lived in areas where everyone baited.

[ This Message was edited by: expatriate on 2002-11-05 14:52 ]
Back to top  
hunt4fud



Joined: 05 Nov 2002
Posts: 1
Location: Louisiana

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2002 7:43 am    Post subject:  

Here in Louisiana many of us bait, but some of us feed deer. What I mean is we put out feed almost year round. I have feeders in the woods but don't hunt over them. I feed from early summer to late winter but stay out of the woods during the spring.

One other thing, baiting only works if you bait a spot where the deer live.
Back to top  
cob



Joined: 28 Oct 2002
Posts: 65
Location: Texas panhandle

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2002 8:31 am    Post subject:  

I don't like the idea of baiting. It's kinda like the discussion about using a guide, it just takes the sport out of it. I had a roomate in college that showed me pictures of huge mulies on the ranch he grew up on. Some of the pictures were great closeups. I asked him if he had and expensive camera, he said "no we had a feeder not far from the house and as long as there was food on the ground you could get real close to them and they wouldn't spook, they were more like pets than wild animals" fortunately they didn't hunt those deer. Thats just the image i've got of hunting over a bait pile. Sneak up to the feeder and pick out your deer. I know it sounds easier than it is most of the time but it still takes some of the challenge and fun out of it.
Back to top  
bitmasher



Joined: 27 Feb 2002
Posts: 2595
Location: Colorado

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2002 11:20 pm    Post subject:  

Hunt4fud, welcome!

The problem with this issue is what does "fair chase" mean. Fair chase is a moving target (pardon the pun) with respect to time.

Consider that relative to pre-rifle, pre-compound bow days, everything today is "unfair" (Expatriate was hitting on this). I got a kick out of one of Expatriates other posts about spear hunting in AL! Can you imagine? That would be a challenge!

This is a bit off topic, but I draw the line when a hunting practice causes torture to the animal. In the end death is equal, but the path to death is not. For instance capital punishment is generally considered "OK" by lethal injection, but less support death by slow drowning or "eye-for-an-eye" methods.

So for me, baiting does not cause torture in and of itself, therefore I'm for it even if it does make the chase easier.
Back to top  
cob



Joined: 28 Oct 2002
Posts: 65
Location: Texas panhandle

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 1:19 pm    Post subject:  

I saw this gizmo in walmart yesterday that i don't know what to think about. it a little pocket-sized speaker that when you push the button it sounds like a deer feeder. you're supposed to set up a feeder on a timer all year and train the deer to think there is going to be food there when they hear it. then when the season starts go sit on your stand and push your little button and wait for them to show up. That doesn't sound fair or fun.
Back to top  
expatriate



Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1148
Location: Alaska

Posted: Tue Nov 12, 2002 7:47 pm    Post subject:  

How's this for fair chase? The following is no kidding, an actual excerpt from Alabama's 2002-2003 hunting regulations:

"Spear: DEER and FERAL SWINE may be taken by hand thrown spear during the open Bow and Arrow season on these species. The hand thrown spear shall have a sharpened blade a minimum of two inches in width. The spear shall only be hand thrown."
Back to top  
bitmasher



Joined: 27 Feb 2002
Posts: 2595
Location: Colorado

Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2002 12:37 am    Post subject:  

Cob, your kidding right? I'd say if a person is getting to the point where they are buying game calls that sounds like their deer feeder, they are taking this food plot stuff a little to seriously. If any of you out there are seriously considering buying this product, please: rattle some antlers, buy a deer decoy, squirt some doe piss on yourself, but for God's sake don't go buy a game call that sounds like a deer feeder! Yikes!

Expatriate, that spear hunting sounds SWEET! I think I'm going to pick up some javelin lessons and head down to AL's archery season some time. That has to be damn tough, I can't imagine stalking a buck, then jumping out of the bushes armed with a SPEAR! Might as well be a large butterfly net!

Are harpoons legal too? Think about it, harpoon your game, run the rope back to your vehicle then drag it out!

Spear hunting is definitely fair chase, harpoons are too as long as they are not atv or vehicle mounted.
Back to top  
thebucklessUpper



Joined: 12 Nov 2002
Posts: 1
Location: Michigan

Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2002 7:47 am    Post subject:  

If people use a 40 acre corn field to hunt off of, what is the difference between a 40 acre corn field & a 5 gallon bait pail????
Back to top  
cob



Joined: 28 Oct 2002
Posts: 65
Location: Texas panhandle

Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2002 10:12 am    Post subject:  

I'VE GOT IT. a new invention. I'm going to sell my idea to the deer feeder call people. its just as effective, will sell for the same price but its cheaper to produce. to the untrained eye it would look a lot like a rock. its a corn field call. you push the button and it makes the same sound a corn field does and gets the deer to "come running straight toward you" (quote is from the back of the deer feeder call package)
Back to top  
expatriate



Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1148
Location: Alaska

Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2002 8:30 pm    Post subject:  

Bitmasher, I don't think spears can be attached to ATVs, either, unless you throw the ATV along with the spear.

Here's another interesting discovery in Alabama's regs. As I'm new to the state, I looked through the regs to find out what would be involved in taking my 12 year old son out. The regs said anyone 16 or over needed a deer tag, and anyone born after 1977 needed hunter safety. Yet the regs mention hunts for youth under 16.

Confused, I called the state and asked if my 12 year old needed a license to hunt. They answered "No." So then I asked if he needed hunter safety training. The answer was, "No, he only needs that to buy a license."

So in Alabama, my 12 year old can hunt for four years without hunter safety training, but he needs to have it when he's 16 or he can't hunt.
Back to top  
expatriate



Joined: 26 Oct 2002
Posts: 1148
Location: Alaska

Posted: Wed Nov 13, 2002 9:27 pm    Post subject:  

Cob, while you're at it you might consider some other calls along the same line:

- A bimbo call that sounds like a wad of hundred dollar bills
- A cat call that sounds like a can opener
- A redneck call that sounds like a beer
- A liberal call that sounds like a TV camera
- A lawyer call that sounds like an ambulance
- A cop call that sounds like a donut
- A toddler call that sounds like parental romance.

Of course, I doubt any of these would be considered fair chase. :wink:
Back to top  
 
       BigGameHunt.net Hunting Forums -> Politics Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4
BGH Hunting HOME | Hunting Forum


Powered by phpBB Search Engine Indexer
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group