50 replies [Last post]
Offline
Location: Missouri/Arkansas
Joined: 08/21/2003
Posts: 891
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Even the first posts are like that, if I didn't know better, I would almost believe they were encoded!

Offline
Location: NONYA,thats in MONTANA
Joined: 07/22/2005
Posts: 242
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Yhe encoded in BS!

bitmasher's picture
Offline
Moderator
Location: Colorado
Joined: 02/27/2002
Posts: 2973
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Nahh I think Oleg's either a nazi, an imperial japanesse, or answers to the name Benito. Read this one:

60 million person was lost because of a colonial policy of England which come to deadlock.

Uh right, but I don't see how the treaty of versailles had anything to do with colonialism. This is just rewriting history to, in this case, serve the aggressors (japan, germany, italy) mission.

Oleg is presumably trying to show that colonial policy has a history of being bad for everyone and presumably the u.s. presence in iraq has something to do colonialism. Colonialism bad, u.s. bad, the arguement goes. Only problem is that iraq isn't a colonialism scenario. If it were, the u.s. would be carpet bombing, shoving the natives into exiles lands, and completeing manifest destiny on arab soil. This is not happening.

Iraq (2002) was disarmed and was ready to cooperate with the United Nations, S.Husejn was deceived, now terrorists protect the country from democratic colonialists.

Shame on You! WTF? Terrorist protect the country? You, I'm sorry, are smoking some very bad ditch weed. What part of protecting citizens involves blowing them to bits and trying to start secretarian war? What part of "protecting the country" involves blowing up potable water facilities? What part of "protecting the country" involves destroying their economy? The insurgents are bad, bad people, period. Anybody that blows up kids is and shame on you for trying to make them look even remotely noble.

Offline
Joined: 07/10/2005
Posts: 22
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

England with the out-of-date antinational form of the board, being
in a precritical condition, being nuclear empire, represents
the basic danger to the world from itself.
Danger is represented also by the foreign policy of England, loosening
the peace relations, developing and aggravating political conflicts.
Before disarmament of England, with a purpose of prevention of occurrence armed
conflicts provoked by England, it is necessary to consider England as a possible aggressor.
It is necessary to conduct defending policy as protection against English colonialism
and to redirect weapons from politically illiterate conductors of war
to their source. England should know that it will not avoid responsibility any more
for kindling of war and for colonization. Disarmament of England
and transfering all authority to democratic bodies would remove military
intensity in the world.

Offline
Joined: 07/10/2005
Posts: 22
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Main principles of English democratic colonization which invaders of Iraq follow by, Hitler sounded 64 years ago.
" We shall declare, that we are compelled to occupy, operate and pacify, that it is done for the sake of the population; that we provide order, communications, feed. We should represent ourselves as liberators. Nobody should guess, that we prepare the final order, but it will not prevent us to take to necessary measures - to send from the country, to shoot - and these measures we shall accept. We shall operate as if we here only temporarily ".
After S.Husejn disarmed the country, and democratic colonialists occupied Iraq, Iraq insurgents use the remained means of conducting emancipating war - terror for emancipating the country.
Democratic colonization goes to a counterbalance to own development of the countries of Asia.
Using natural aspiration of people to an establishment of a free society,
and backwardness of system of the state and local management, before occupation, democratic colonialists aggravate contradictions arising on this way, collide a society together to irreconcilable opposition.

HISTORY REPEATS
http://www.genevo.org/p2i.htm

Offline
Location: Missouri/Arkansas
Joined: 08/21/2003
Posts: 891
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Oleg, in light of all that has happened lately, the bombings and all, maybe statements such as these are not such a good idea.

Offline
Moderator
Location: Florida,USA
Joined: 08/21/2003
Posts: 1566
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Oleg281,
OK you have an opinion of what is all wrong so you MUST have an opinion about what should be the correct way of dealing with such world turmoil.
Enough of the rhetoric lets hear your answer to it all.
Forget the triangle and pyramid crap on the website you linked to, lets hear your own words.

Better hurry though before some idiot drives their bomb ladened car thru the internet cafe you are sitting in and pushes the garage door opener and levels the place taking with them anyone within a 500 yard radius in the name of their God or opressed people.

Offline
Location: NONYA,thats in MONTANA
Joined: 07/22/2005
Posts: 242
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

No stay where u are we might get lucky!! Thumbs up Thumbs up Thumbs up

Offline
Joined: 08/27/2004
Posts: 1964
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

LMAO

Offline
Joined: 07/10/2005
Posts: 22
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Similarities are not present, except for:

1. In opinion of London in Sudetes in 1938 human rights were broken,
and Czechoslovakia threatened the peace in the Europe.
In opinion of London in Iraq in 2003 human rights were broken,
and Iraq threatened safety in the world.
2. London lobbied occupation of Sudetes in 1938 and Iraq in 2003.
3. Military force in these operations is assigned to the most armed countries
during corresponding times.
4. Sudetes and Iraq had become the important strategic and raw resource.
5. London shifts the responsibility for occupation on the countries-allies.
Attitudes before the allied countries change.
The policy becomes internal matter.

As well as 64 years ago a priority policy of London is a struggle for
human rights in the East.

Does similarity comes to an end on this?

Related Forum Threads You Might Like

ThreadThread StarterRepliesLast Updated
Who were the greatest bear hunters in history?Scandinavia405/10/2010 10:41 am
Greatest moose hunter in history?Scandinavia704/15/2010 15:16 pm
New to forumcapnray510/16/2009 13:59 pm
redneck4point_009/01/2010 23:44 pm
It pays to be careful around old people.Hiker512/24/2007 20:18 pm