50 replies [Last post]
Offline
Joined: 07/10/2005
Posts: 22
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

England which made so much for nazism, has remained out of work after occupation of the Europe by nazis. Hitler not only ignored interests of England but also "put to the place" his neighbour. To Hitler it was enough, and further - to the East.
There was no second front. The England-American front was urgently opened and question about repartition of the Europe was rised then.

Hitler's policy was based on
political views of London in many respects. Hitler headed a policy of colonization.
So " the policy of pacification" actually was a policy of the consent with
Hitler's actions, but it was replaced by policy of treachery to Hitler after, though
ideological views of London have not changed.

Iraq (2002) was disarmed and was ready to cooperate with the United Nations, S.Husejn was deceived, now terrorists protect the country from democratic colonialists.

Offline
Moderator
Location: Florida,USA
Joined: 08/21/2003
Posts: 1566
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS
Oleg281 wrote:
S.Husejn was deceived, now terrorists protect the country from democratic colonialists.

Deceived?
Explaination please.
Quote sources please.

Offline
Joined: 08/27/2004
Posts: 1964
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

hussain deserves what he gets

Offline
Location: Missouri/Arkansas
Joined: 08/21/2003
Posts: 891
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

War! - huh- yeah-
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Uh-huh
War! – huh – yeah-
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Say it again y’all

War! – huh – good God
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Listen to me…

Ohhh… War! I despise
Because it means destruction’
Of innocent lives

War means tears
to thousands of mothers eyes
When their sons go to fight
and lose their lives

I said - War! Huh – Good God y’all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Say it again

War! Whoa, Lord
What is it good for
Absolutely nothing
Listen to me…

War! It ain’t nothing but a heartbreaker
War! Friend only to the undertaker
War! It’s an enemy to all mankind
The thought of war blows my mind

War has caused unrest in the younger generation
Induction then destruction-
Who wants to die?

Ohhh… War – Good God Y’all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Say it, Say it, Say it

War! Uh-huh – Yeah - Huh!
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Listen to me…

War! It ain’t nothing but a heartbreaker
War! It’s got one friend, that’s the undertaker
War has shattered many a young mans dreams
Made him disabled bitter and mean
Life is much to precious to spend fighting wars these days
War can’t give life, it can only take it away

War! Huh – Good God y’all
What is it good for?
Absolutely nothing
Say it again

War! Whoa, Lord
What is it good for
Absolutely nothing
Listen to me…

War! It ain’t nothing but a heartbreaker
War! Friend only to the undertaker
Peace Love and Understanding;
tell me, is there no place for them today?
They say we must fight to keep our freedom
But Lord knows there’s got to be a better way

War! Huh – Good God y’all
What is it good for?
You tell me
Say it, Say it, Say it

War! Huh – Good God y’all
What is it good for?
Stand up and shout it.
Nothing!

Offline
Joined: 07/10/2005
Posts: 22
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

1. The economy of Germany after defeat in the First World war was completely under the control of the English capital (reparation, credits).
By 1932 Englishmen did not know what is more favourably for England - credits or reparations, and democratic elections passed under the control of the English capital.
2. Hitler has won democratic elections owing to support of London.
Money come also directly from abroad: English oil king Deterding, a friend of Hoffmann and Rehberg, supplied Hitler with currency on a regular basis (he gave 10 million of dutch guldens once).
3 England never consider seriously to Hitler. Hitler was a hope as a force which is capable to control people.
4 When war began? Was Czechoslovakia occupied after partition of Poland? England initiated war.
5 Hitler was not going to occupy England. Hitler understood, that England is the leading colonial power, and England understood that there must be no friends in war for colonies.
Military actions against England had inconsistent character.
Luftvaffe never undertook concentrated attacks to the British radar stations, and they had huge value for defense of the country. Hitler counted, that having transferred bombardments on cities of England he will compel London to go for negotiations. Negotiations about what?
6. The second front was conducted in Africa in trying to solve colonial problems.
Only people's liberation movements and USSR battled against colonialism. For England the main thing was preservation of owned colonies and repartition of the Europe.
7. 60 million person was lost because of a colonial policy of England which come to deadlock.

Offline
Location: Missouri/Arkansas
Joined: 08/21/2003
Posts: 891
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

I'm sorry, but is there a point here? Where exactly are you going with this?

Offline
Joined: 07/10/2005
Posts: 22
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Falling of pro-English authority in democratic
protectorates approaches falling of authority in mother country.

In the English society where there is a leadership of mercenary interests
and concentration of authority at financial circles,
colonialists represent safety from acts of terrorism
as the basic condition of preservation of their democracy.
Safety is provided by indifference to colonized
people, unauthenticity of the information, neutralization of opposition,
development of political apathy in a society, the statement of fear for the life.

Offline
Location: Missouri/Arkansas
Joined: 08/21/2003
Posts: 891
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

Ok, this is giving me a headache. Let's see if we can break this down.

1. You're saying that colonialists offer protection from concentrated financial authorities and mercenary interests? Please elaborate on this in a clear, logical fashion so it does not look like you are merely playing with words. Brick Wall,)

2. You indicate that safety in this case is provided by indifference to colonized people, information that is false (unauthentic), neutralization of opposition, in other words, eradicating all who oppose the system, development of political apathy (lack of interest) in society, and the statement of fear for the life.

Question: How is safety provided by false information, indifference, neutralizing opposition, political apathy, and the statement of fear for life?

Offline
Location: NONYA,thats in MONTANA
Joined: 07/22/2005
Posts: 242
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

You should ask our government that question,it seems to work well for them..

cowgal's picture
Offline
Moderator
Location: Colorado
Joined: 03/10/2002
Posts: 1787
War after war, whether is new one? HISTORY REPEATS

I'm guessing Oleg isn't American or English. Oleg, you're from an eastern European country, am I correct?

Even though his thought process is hard to follow, I gather he's anti-English and anti-democracy (possibly anti-American as well?). I think he's trying to tell us we're helping countries that do not want our help.

All in all I don't see the purpose of this post. How does it relate to the politics of hunting???

I agree with the headache part... its given me one just trying to figure it out!

Related Forum Threads You Might Like

ThreadThread StarterRepliesLast Updated
Who were the greatest bear hunters in history?Scandinavia405/10/2010 10:41 am
Greatest moose hunter in history?Scandinavia704/15/2010 15:16 pm
New to forumcapnray510/16/2009 13:59 pm
redneck4point_009/01/2010 23:44 pm
It pays to be careful around old people.Hiker512/24/2007 20:18 pm