26 replies [Last post]
Offline
Location: Pipestone, MN
Joined: 01/02/2008
Posts: 117
Say No to Holder

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I say Call ALL on this list, they don't have to be "your" Senator and just express NO!
They won't record comments but do keep track of numbers of yes or no callers and emails. So it is important, whether you think they listen/agree or not.

I'll make it easy for ALL to Call!!!!!!!
TIME IS SHORT<<<<>>>>>CALL TODAY

Washington, DC 20510

Majority Office
Phone:202-224-7703 Fax:202-224-9516

Minority Office
Phone:202-224-5225 Fax:202-224-9102

The Members

Patrick J. Leahy - Chairman, D-Vermont

Email

433 Russell Senate Office Bldg
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-4242 Fax 202.334224.3479

Herb Kohl - D-Wisconsin

Email

330 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-4903
Phone: 202-224-5653 Fax: 202-224-9787

Dianne Feinstein - D-California

Email

United States Senate
331 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-3841 Fax: (202) 228-3954

Russell D. Feingold - D-Wisconsin

Email

506 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-4904
Phone: 202-224-5323 Fax: 202-224-2725

Charles E. Schumer - D-New York

Web Contact Form

313 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-3201
Phone:202-224-6542 Fax:202-228-3027

Richard J. Durbin - D-Illinois

Web Contact Form

309 Hart Senate Bldg.
Washington, DC 20510
9 am to 6 pm
(202) 224-2152 - ph (202) 228-0400 - fx

Benjamin L. Cardin - D-Maryland

Web Contact Form

509 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-4524 Fax: 202-224-1651

Sheldon Whitehouse - D-Rhode Island

Web Contact Form

Hart Senate Office Building Room 502
Washington, D.C. 20510
202-224-2921 phone 202-228-6362 fax

Arlen Specter - Ranking Member, R-Pennsylvania

Web Contact Form

711 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-3802
Phone:202-224-4254 Fax:202-228-1229

Orrin G. Hatch - R-Utah

Web Contact Form

104 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-4402
Phone: 202-224-5251 Fax: 202-224-6331

Charles E. Grassley - R-Iowa

Web Contact Form

135 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-1501
(202) 224-3744 No Fax Listed

Jon Kyl - R-Arizona

Web Contact Form

730 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-4521 Fax: 202-224-2207

Jeff Sessions - R-Alabama

Web Conact Form

335 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-0104
Phone: 202-224-4124 Fax: 202-224-3149

Lindsey Graham - R-South Carolina

Web Contact Form

290 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-5972 Fax: 202-224-3808

John Cornyn - R-Texas

Web Contact Form

517 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-4304
Phone:202-224-2934 Fax: 202-228-2856

Sam Brownback - R-Kansas

Web Contact Form

303 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Phone: 202-224-6521 Fax: 202-228-1265

Tom Coburn - R-Oklahoma

Web Contact Form

172 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-3603
Phone: 202-224-5754 Fax: 202-224-6008

Dave

Offline
Location: Montana
Joined: 10/24/2006
Posts: 449
Say No to Holder

I called.
I cannot understand how any gun owner wouldnt be on the phone and emailing their opinion letting themselves be counted

Offline
Location: Pipestone, MN
Joined: 01/02/2008
Posts: 117
Say No to Holder

APATHY is running deep here as well Romey. Seems like there is very little interest in what's important. That is why we continuely loose ground in our battles to protect the Second Amendment

Far far too many, don't give a sh!t !!!!!! You hear a lot of whinin whimperin and bitchin, but see or hear little action,,,,,,,,,Sad Deal

Dave

cowgal's picture
Offline
Moderator
Location: Colorado
Joined: 03/10/2002
Posts: 1787
Say No to Holder

Onesonek I hope you're not implying that the apathy is here among the BGH forum members.

We all KNOW Holder is bad news, and its not just his stance on the 2nd amendment. His confirmation has been postponed for a week.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/01/21/senate-postpones...

Still time for everyone to call. If you want to call your own state representatives, a quick search on google will bring up the phone numbers and web sites you need.

Offline
Location: Pipestone, MN
Joined: 01/02/2008
Posts: 117
Say No to Holder
cowgal wrote:
Onesonek I hope you're not implying that the apathy is here among the BGH forum members.

We all KNOW Holder is bad news, and its not just his stance on the 2nd amendment. His confirmation has been postponed for a week.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/01/21/senate-postpones...

Still time for everyone to call. If you want to call your own state representatives, a quick search on google will bring up the phone numbers and web sites you need.

Well let me put it this way cowgal.
I put this same info out on several boards, basically in front of 100-150000 board members. The amount of views or response's was about the same. I seen trivial post receive 2-3 times the attention.
I see that as lack of interest or concern for these very important issues.
By defintion, yes I see apathy amongst the gun owners in a lot of places.
This lack of interest and personal involvement is way we continuely lose ground!
It wasn't meant to be an offensive statement, but a wakeup call !!!!

Dave

expatriate's picture
Offline
Location: Arizona
Joined: 10/26/2002
Posts: 3207
Say No to Holder

If you post that much, you should've noticed that most of the discussion goes to controversial threads. When everyone agrees with what's said, what is there to add?

Offline
Location: Montana
Joined: 10/24/2006
Posts: 449
Say No to Holder

I think the point is not discussion but action

expatriate's picture
Offline
Location: Arizona
Joined: 10/26/2002
Posts: 3207
Say No to Holder

I agree -- just pointing out that lack of discussion on a thread isn't necessarily a barometer of political sentiment.

Offline
Location: Montana
Joined: 10/24/2006
Posts: 449
Say No to Holder

Very true sir

Offline
Location: Pipestone, MN
Joined: 01/02/2008
Posts: 117
Say No to Holder
expatriate wrote:
I agree -- just pointing out that lack of discussion on a thread isn't necessarily a barometer of political sentiment.

It's not discussion or reply I was counting,,,,,,,it was the lack of veiws I was using as the barometer.
Nobody is reading!!!!! Now hopefully that means everybody is up to speed ou the issue's. I find it to be the other way around though.

Dave

Offline
Location: Pipestone, MN
Joined: 01/02/2008
Posts: 117
Say No to Holder
expatriate wrote:
If you post that much, you should've noticed that most of the discussion goes to controversial threads. When everyone agrees with what's said, what is there to add?

I agree this is the case, as with controverial threads. But the point is nobody's reading the important one's.
My other thought is,,,,,,,,,,I have heard it possible that "sypder web technology"
is used to monitor discussion boards of all types all over the net.
Now I hate to think that is so, but I can beleive it possible. Would it not be best to discuss and bolster our opinions every chance we get, even if it is boringly repetitive?????

Just food for thought
Dave

Related Forum Threads You Might Like