5 replies [Last post]
Offline
Moderator
Joined: 01/27/2002
Posts: 7916
New Record Colorado Elk Harvest

Full Story:

New Record Colorado Elk Harvest

Please use this area to post comments or questions about this news item.

bitmasher's picture
Offline
Moderator
Location: Colorado
Joined: 02/27/2002
Posts: 2973
New Record Colorado Elk Harvest

Sounds like it will be another good elk hunting year. Although I didn't have a bull tag last year, I read/heard that quite a few nice bulls were taken. Should be more of the same this year.

Offline
Location: Powderhorn, Colorado
Joined: 04/07/2003
Posts: 167
New Record Colorado Elk Harvest

The thing that gets me is the D.O.W. tells you how many elk were harvested but they don't have a check in system for animals that are harvested. Maybe a few phone calls.
Maybe a lot of guessing????

bitmasher's picture
Offline
Moderator
Location: Colorado
Joined: 02/27/2002
Posts: 2973
New Record Colorado Elk Harvest

That is a good question about how they arrive at their final numbers. They should release a margin of error with their results. It doesn't seem possible that they would know "61,174" with absolute precision.

However I do think they can probably nail it within +/- 10%, based on a few pieces of data. Here are some guess on how they get the numbers....

- A few well placed check stations with knowing how many animals will and will not come through the station for the unit (on average). Extrapolate to other units.

- Submitted heads for cwd checking and knowing on average how many hunters will submit an animal for testing. Extrapolate to other units.

- Random phone calls to those that purchased over the counter tags or drew out. Random sampling of a group can be quite accurate when the sampling is done correctly. I know the DOW used to do this, not sure if they still do.

- Probably the most important is doing a prehunt and posthunt animal survey per unit. By calculating the difference in these numbers the total harvest can be derived.

saskie's picture
Offline
Moderator
Location: West Carleton, Ottawa, Canada
Joined: 12/23/2002
Posts: 1264
New Record Colorado Elk Harvest

I'd say the answer is E) ALL OF THE ABOVE - most notably the pre and post hunt surveys. Especially if they have a good feel for the traditional movements of the herd during the year. The "exact" sounding figure was probably the result of a computer modelling program.

[ This Message was edited by: saskie on 2003-04-13 23:56 ]

bitmasher's picture
Offline
Moderator
Location: Colorado
Joined: 02/27/2002
Posts: 2973
New Record Colorado Elk Harvest

Yes it is probably a conglomerate of all the above and some modeling. None the less, the DOW should release some margin of error with the info. Since giving five sig-figs (meaning that they know each of the 5 digits of 61174 precisely) of precision is mis-leading.

In fact without releasing a margin of error it is impossible to know whether it really was a record year. If the margin of error in their methods was +/- 20% that would put it in the bounds of last years results (42k elk again assuming a +/-20% error) and make it impossible to know whether or not it was a record year or not.

That being said, it seemed like a pretty good year. Lot of elk and a lot of people I knew tagged out....

Related Forum Threads You Might Like

ThreadThread StarterRepliesLast Updated
Hows the Colorado elk herds?TwoBear512/28/2010 21:32 pm
New CO State Record Moosehawkeye270503/31/2012 10:07 am
184 6/8 Ram, 3rd largest in ColoradoPSEBowhunter008/10/2004 13:35 pm
Tennessee's deer harvest so farTndeerhunter112/13/2010 11:19 am
Record muley from Rifle CO?cowgal803/07/2009 13:37 pm