67 replies [Last post]
Offline
Location: Colorado
Joined: 07/13/2011
Posts: 920
56,000 acres, and 45%

56,000 acres, and 45% contained. 

Might be 100 degrees today. Not good.

BikerRN's picture
Offline
Grand Slam Challenge Winner!
Joined: 05/23/2011
Posts: 712
We've had over 100 years of

We've had over 100 years of fire suppression and the intensity and feriocity of these fires shows that.

Stay safe and fireproof your house and property as much as you can.

Ca_Vermonster's picture
Offline
Grand Slam Challenge Winner!Moderator
Location: San Diego, CA
Joined: 07/27/2007
Posts: 5765
That's the main problem.  We

That's the main problem.  We became so afraid of fires, and kept knocking them down so quickly, the fuel just built up and up and up.  Happened with the fires here in San Diego, where some of the brush hadn't burned in 50-60 years.

Glad to see the containment #'s rising, sucks that the weather is so hot.

In San Diego, we ended up in 2003 with 2,820 buildings (2,458 homes) destroyed, 16 people killed.  In 2007, it was 1912 (1246) with 7 killed. Really, really scary.  Praying that they don't lose control again of this one in CO.......

Retired2hunt's picture
Offline
Grand Slam Challenge Winner!
Location: Colorado Springs, CO & Fort Myers, FL
Joined: 07/28/2011
Posts: 1615
Forest Fire Web-Sites

 

Here are two pretty good web site links I have been using - http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/nfn.htm and http://www.inciweb.org/incident/2904/

 

 

Retired2hunt's picture
Offline
Grand Slam Challenge Winner!
Location: Colorado Springs, CO & Fort Myers, FL
Joined: 07/28/2011
Posts: 1615
  Here is the Springer fire

 

Here is the Springer fire from my backyard...

Springer Fire

PreviewAttachmentSize
Wildfire.jpg
Wildfire.jpg69.93 KB
exbiologist's picture
Offline
Moderator
Location: Colorado
Joined: 09/19/2008
Posts: 2399
major potential

That Springer Fire has some major growth potential for the next two days.  Firefighters ought to be able to slow things down when we get east winds for the next two days after that.  But if they can't get some lines built, that one'll grow like crazy too.

Ca_Vermonster's picture
Offline
Grand Slam Challenge Winner!Moderator
Location: San Diego, CA
Joined: 07/27/2007
Posts: 5765
Obviously this is a distant

Obviously this is a distant concern, well after loss of life and homes, but just curious, are the areas that the fire is hitting prime game areas?  Elk, deer, etc.?

exbiologist's picture
Offline
Moderator
Location: Colorado
Joined: 09/19/2008
Posts: 2399
kinda

Well, the High Park Fire is in unit 19, and right next to the Hewlett Fire in 191.  Unit 19 is all north facing slopes of the Poudre Canyon.  Currently it's a crappy place to hunt and amongst the lowest success units in the whole state, usually single digit success rates.  Almost the entire unit is a monoculture of beetle killed black timber.  However, it's an extremely popular unit because it's right next to Fort Collins, and at one time harbored decent elk hunting.  Then, with CWD management, the population was reduced to about 1/3 of the population of about 10-15 years ago, and along with the timber issues, the unit has really lagged since the late 90s (I think).

This fire will be a huge help in improving the habitat and huntability of the area.  Despite what everyone thinks, it will not be a complete burn.  There will still be strips and patches of timber left to harbor elk and deer.

It will displace a ton of bears and you can expect to see them in town shortly.

The Hewlett Fire was in the middle of a Bighorn Sheep and mule deer area with a few elk.  I doubt it will help the elk hunting as it burned what little timber there was in that area.  However, it should attract a lot of deer, though I doubt it will increase the carrying capacity at all.  191 is mostly the south facing slopes of the Poudre (north side of the river).  It was already the dry side and didn't have much for heavy timber.  So in this case, I'd say it will hurt more than it helps.

The Little Sand Fire in 77 is in the midst of a huge stand of heavy timber, though not beetle killed.  I'd guess it will be a huge help to both the deer and elk, but like the High Park fire, will probably cause a lot of bear problems this year.  I don't think it opened up any habitat for sheep though.  But, it is along a major river, and there could be some canyon country opened up that the sheep could use.  I doubt it though.  More likely the deer will use it more heavily in the future and elk will use the area in later seasons.

Ca_Vermonster's picture
Offline
Grand Slam Challenge Winner!Moderator
Location: San Diego, CA
Joined: 07/27/2007
Posts: 5765
That was one thing about the

That was one thing about the fires out here that was actually good.  The amount of browse is created the folowing couple of years helped out our deer herds tremendously.  The racks got bigger, and the success rate went up from 7% to about 12%.  Fawn survival went way up too.

As long as the animals can get out of the way of the actual fire itself, what's left can be a blessing in disguise.

BleuBijou's picture
Offline
Location: Loveland , Colorado
Joined: 03/22/2010
Posts: 472
Looks like

They set some backfires! I am seeing smoke up high and to the West working down a ridgeline to the East!! No smoke on either side of this fire line! Doesn't have the look of a spot fire! I will have to do some checking!!

Related Forum Threads You Might Like

ThreadThread StarterRepliesLast Updated
Angel Fire, NM elk huntingbuckem306/19/2011 13:02 pm
Los Conchas Fire in NMniceshot_smitty607/12/2011 10:44 am
King Canyon fireDon Fischer207/08/2008 16:42 pm
Fire informationexbiologist907/01/2010 19:19 pm
Fire Bans in Coloradokyotee508/12/2002 20:41 pm